Dave Burke : Freelance .NET Web Developer specializing in Online Communities

A provocative article on Vista Disappointment by Paul Thurrott

Paul Thurrott's recent article titled "Windows Vista February 2006 CTP (Build 5308/5342) Review, Part 5: Where Vista Fails" was front page Tech Memeorandum today so I started reading it...and kept reading it until I finished it.  I don't often read lengthy articles like this one, particularly about Vista which I'm really not all that interested in.  This article kept my attention though.

This is one of those provocative and articulate articles where you might think, "Dang, that guy should get huge recognition from the IT industry for writing this or he should be fired!"  I'm in the Recognition camp, myself.  The root of Thurrott's disappointment stemmed from PDC  2003 (2003!) when Longhorn appeared, full of promise and innovation.  That was, of course, so long ago and a wildly different product than the Vista reality of 2006, er, 2007.

Thurrott wrote with fairness, balance and with respect of the individuals behind Vista's evolution throughout the article, but he didn't pull any punches on either the failures of Vista or those behind it.  For instance, this honest assessment of Gates' role.

When Bill Gates revealed in mid-2003 that he was returning to his roots, so to speak, and spending half of his time on what was then still called Longhorn, we should have seen the warning signs. Sadly, Gates, too, is part of the Bad Microsoft, a vestige of the past who should have had the class to either formally step down from the company or at least play just an honorary role, not step up his involvement and get his hands dirty with the next Windows version. If blame is to be assessed, we must start with Gates. He has guided--or, through lack of leadership--failed to guide the development of Microsoft's most prized asset. He has driven it into the ground.

Some of Thurrott's technical descriptions of what we can expect in Vista, like User Account Protection, Glass Windows or the new Media Center are downright scary. 

It's all so sad, really.  I think I'll go downstairs, slip in my Riverdance DVD and forget I ever read this article.


[tags: Microsoft, Vista]

Comments (5) | Post RSS RSS comment feed

Posted on 4/19/2006 9:00:00 PM by Dave Burke
Categories: Everyday
Tags:

Related posts

Comments (5) -

4/20/2006 8:51:06 AM Permalink

I had just read this as well. I thought it was a bit harsh but I had just finished the Fortune article on Ray Ozzie so it was a stark contrast. Also, I was at that PDC and remember the hype and "high" from it that later dwindled as time slipped by. money.cnn.com/.../index.htm

John Watson |

4/20/2006 1:42:08 PM Permalink

I've been testing out the betas/CTP's for a while now...I'm also EXTREMELY disappointed in what it actually delivers.  It's not even THAT pretty to look at, and it's way too "in your face" about the security stuff. Granted that can be turned off on the LAN via Group Policy, but that defeats the whole purpose.  MS is about to have a nightmare on their hands.

That being said, from a developer's standpoint it's still a very compelling release under the hood, what with WinFX/IIS7 etc.  It's sad that this will probably be the first version of Windows that I don't upgrade my main dev box to immediately.  Myabe around SP1.

Btw, I think Thurrott is bi-polar. A good writer, but he's all over the radar lately. Someone give that man some meds.

jayson knight |

4/20/2006 2:27:00 PM Permalink

John, I'll BET that article was in stark contrast to the Ozzie article! Smile  So you were at the PDC in 2003.  I remember the hyper even though I wasn't there.  Thanks for your comments.

And so Jayson, it looks like the sad Vista story is true if you're confirming it.  Dang, now no amount of Riverdance is going to lift my spirits again!   I don't read enough Thurrott is catch the polar effect.  I thought this Vista article was thorough, balanced, non-aggressive, just all-around a well-written piece.   If you have extra meds, don't forget about your buddy in Vermont...

daveburke |

5/17/2006 8:12:50 PM Permalink

I think the Vista RTM is going to be a disappointment, they spent too much time on things like Glass instead of the things that really mattered. I would like to make a few predictions though. I think IE 7 is going to be superb (It already is to me in the beta 2 version). I think the 'in your face' security thing is going to be tweaked and become *almost* a non issue. Microsoft has already said 'Yeah, it sucks, we just turned it on and havent done any real UAT yet'. I think when SP1 comes out, Vista is going to really shine. I think it is going to be like SP2 for XP, where 1) They use a SP to add features instead of just bug fixes and 2) It is going to be as big a difference between Vista and Vista SP1 as it is between Vista and XP now. All the things that they dropped for time will be in SP1, it will be longer in the making than we would like, but when it comes, then we will actually have close to what we expect(ed) from Vista from the 2003 PDC, including I believe, WinFS. Hell, they have been promising it since Windows 2000 was called NT 5, they have to deliver it sometime ;)

Bob |

5/17/2006 8:49:29 PM Permalink

Bob, thank you for that thoughtful and probably right-on comment.  I particularly appreciate your optimistic assessment of the situation.  I'll stay positive and look forward to the SPs.  Thanks!

daveburke |


Powered by BlogEngine.NET 2.0.0.36
Theme by Dave Burke